By 9jaeye 
The Nigerian House of Representatives recently rejected a proposed bill that aimed to expand the jurisdiction of Sharia Courts of Appeal, allowing them to handle criminal cases in states where Sharia law is currently practiced. This decision, which has stirred considerable public debate, follows growing concerns from citizens and advocacy groups about the implications of broadening Sharia’s scope in a secular, multi-religious country like Nigeria.
Introduced by Hon. Abdullahi Salame from Sokoto State, the bill sought to amend sections 262 and 277 of Nigeria’s Constitution. As explained by Salame, the amendment would have granted Sharia Courts the authority to handle “hudad” and “qisas” offenses, which are criminal cases under Islamic law. Currently, these courts primarily focus on civil issues, making this proposal a significant shift. The bill sparked concerns, however, with some arguing that it could challenge Nigeria’s commitment to a secular legal framework.
Lawmakers Respond to Public Concerns
In response to public outcry, lawmakers clarified that many people misunderstood the bill’s intent. They explained that the expansion aimed to support Muslim citizens in states already practicing Sharia law, rather than impose it on other regions. Nevertheless, critics, including secular and religious groups, pointed out that granting Sharia Courts additional powers could lead to heightened religious tensions. For this reason, they urged lawmakers to maintain a clear separation between religious and national laws.
Several representatives also clarified that this rejection does not dismiss the legal needs of Muslims but rather highlights the need for balanced and inclusive legislation. The House has promised to continue discussions on how best to address the concerns of all Nigerian citizens, ensuring that any legal adjustments will uphold the country’s principles of equality and justice.
Public Reactions and Future Implications
Following the House’s decision, various groups welcomed the rejection, viewing it as a reaffirmation of Nigeria’s dedication to its secular constitution. Critics of the bill stressed that laws should protect and serve all citizens equally, regardless of their faith. Moreover, they argued that introducing criminal jurisdiction into Sharia Courts would risk deepening religious divides, especially in a country as diverse as Nigeria.
Looking forward, lawmakers assured the public that they would pursue any future amendments to Sharia’s role in Nigerian law with transparency. For now, the rejection of this bill serves as a reminder of the House’s commitment to considering diverse perspectives in the legislative process.
For more of interesting stories and Breaking News, check 9ja Eye News categories.