By 9jaeye 
In a recent decision, the Chief Magistrate Court in Wuse Zone 6, Abuja, granted social media activist Martins Otse, widely known as VeryDarkMan, bail set at N2 million. The activist faced charges related to unauthorized use of a police uniform, which he allegedly wore in a viral video. This case has since generated significant public attention and discussion around freedom of expression, digital activism, and legal accountability.
The prosecution argued that Otse’s decision to wear a police uniform aimed to mislead the public and could damage law enforcement’s integrity. While they argued the need for accountability, Otse’s defense team responded by framing the act as satire. They emphasized that his intention was never to deceive or cause harm but rather to use humor to address social issues, an approach that Otse frequently adopts in his online activism.
Court’s Conditions and Approach to the Case
The presiding magistrate, Ibrahim Mohammed, acknowledged the seriousness of the charges and opted to grant bail under strict conditions. Setting bail at N2 million, the court required Otse to secure two reliable sureties, each with verifiable addresses within Abuja. In addition, Otse must surrender his passport and report to the court bi-weekly until the trial reaches a conclusion. By outlining these conditions, the court aimed to balance the defendant’s right to bail with the need to ensure he attends future hearings.
Mohammed also used the hearing as an opportunity to remind supporters of the importance of respect for legal processes. With tensions rising among Otse’s followers, the magistrate requested calm and cooperation throughout the court proceedings. Security around the court has been increased to maintain order, given the case’s high-profile nature and the large following Otse has gained online.
Public Reaction and Broader Implications
Unsurprisingly, this case has ignited a wave of reactions on social media, where Otse’s supporters view him as a defender of free speech and social justice. Many followers argue that his satirical style sheds light on issues often overlooked. Yet, some critics question whether his approach oversteps legal boundaries, especially in the context of impersonating law enforcement.
As the trial progresses, this case is expected to spark broader discussions on the boundaries of digital activism and how satire can intersect with legal responsibilities.
For more of interesting stories and Breaking News, check 9ja Eye News categories.